However if you like troubleshooting these issues and are excited about ARM Mac, go for it! My plan is for those kinds of people to fix these issues. My biggest concern is getting an ARM Mac and realizing I simply can't run an essential application on it. There will be a lot of problems early on, and not all of them will have solutions. VMware Fusion - Simple Virtual Machines for Mac. Supported host operating systems include Windows, Linux, and macOS. VirtualBox - Run nearly any operating system on a single machine and to freely switch between OS instances. I had intermittent slow emulator (SDK v8.0) load times. Oracle VM VirtualBox is open source virtualization software that allows users to run.

But if you use virtualization often, I wouldn't recommend it. Mac users can also try VMware Fusion, which should also offer better performance than VirtualBox.

Should you get an ARM Mac if you're a developer? If you work largely on frontend, mobile, or native apps, you'll probably be fine. It's possible Apple could release more virtualization tools before the ARM Mac launches. The point of this post isn't to say that ARM Mac is a bad idea, but to give a realistic idea of what developing on one would look like assuming nothing changes. It might be added later with the ability to run ARM Windows, though Microsoft would have to approve. Boot Camp will definitely not be available on ARM Macs. Bootcamp Bootcamp creates 2 totally separate operating.

Boot Camp is an Apple-approved way to dual-boot Mac OS and Windows. Options for operating systems emulators include Bootcamp, Parallels, VMWare Fusion and VirtualBox.

Mac fusion emulator on virtualbox